CLINICAL DATA
Study Summary |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Title |
An Eight-Week Clinical Study to Determine the Effectiveness of One (1) Hair Care Product |
||
Protocol Number |
3920YS0215 |
||
Sponsor |
YaySave! |
||
Methodology |
Monadic (clinical evaluation), Controlled (Repeated Grooming Assay) |
||
Objective |
To evaluate the efficacy of a hair care product to improvethe appearance and condition of hair and scalp. |
||
Number of Subjects |
30 to complete, target enrollment 34 |
||
Target Population |
Male and Female subjects, age 30-70 years old |
||
Duration |
8 weeks (Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8) + optional 4-Week extension (Week 12) |
||
Claims |
Claim |
Support |
|
Reduces hair loss due to breakage |
Repeated Grooming Assay |
||
Improves strength of hair |
|||
Adds body and shine to hair |
Subjective Questionnaire Clinical Grading |
||
Increases volume and thickness |
|||
Promotes healthy scalp |
|||
Reduces split ends |
|||
Provides deep hydration (to scalp) |
Corneometer Subjective Questionnaire |
||
Study Products |
Name |
Formula Number |
|
Pura d'or Hair Loss Prevention Therapy Shampoo |
851615006006 |
||
Statistical Methodology |
Descriptive statistics reported, change from Baseline (monadic: Paired T-test; mean at time point compared to baseline, p≤0.05, mean percent change compared to baseline. All final statistical analyses will be performed on the PP population. |
||
Study Schedule |
Initiation |
Baseline (D0) |
July 31, 2015 |
|
Begin Product Use (D3) |
August 3, 2015 |
|
Interim |
Week 4 |
August 28, 2015 |
|
Completion |
Week 8 |
September 25, 2015 |
|
Option |
Week 12 |
October 23, 2015 |
|
Schedule of Deliverables |
Intermediate Topline |
Week 4 |
September 14, 2015 |
Final Topline |
Week 8 (Week 12 optional) |
October 9, 2015 (November 6, 2015) |
|
Photographs |
5 Weeks after study completion |
8-Week Study: October 30, 2015 12-Week Study: December 1, 2015 |
|
Draft Final Report: |
5 Weeks after study completion |
8-Week Study: October 30, 2015 12-Week Study: December 1, 2015 |
|
Summary |
This was an eight-week, monadic evaluation of the effects of one test product on the condition and appearance of hair and scalp. A study panel of 32 subjects was enrolled in the study and 31 completed eight weeks of participation. The study also included a single use controlled instrumental evaluation of the product performed on hair tresses to evaluate strength. Under the conditions of this study, use of Pura d'or Hair Loss Prevention Therapy Shampoo #851615006006led to significant improvements in hair and scalp appearance and in hair strength, as evidenced by results from expert clinical grading, hair strength testing and subjective questionnaire results. See Section 20.0 Conclusion for further detail. |
Quality Assurance Statement
This report accurately reflects the data derived from the procedures and materials tested in this study. The conclusions are based on an interpretation of the data and have been reviewed by the Principal Investigator(s) and by personnel from International Research Services, Inc. responsible for assuring its accuracy.
Table of Contents
8.0 Concomitant Medications and Products
10.0 Institutional Review Board
16.0 Quality Control and Quality Assurance
Appendices
Appendix I |
Protocol |
Appendix II |
Protocol Amendment |
Appendix III |
Data Listing and Statistical Report |
List of Abbreviations
AE |
Adverse Event |
BL |
Baseline |
C |
Collect |
CRFs |
Case Report Forms |
D |
Dispense |
D0 |
Day 0 (Baseline) |
D1, 2, 3 |
Day 1, 2, 3 |
FDA |
Federal Drug Administration |
ICF |
Informed Consent Form |
ICH |
International Conference on Harmonization |
IRSI |
International Research Services, Inc. |
N |
Number of Subjects |
NI |
No Improvement |
PI |
Principal Investigator |
PP |
Per protocol |
SAE |
Serious Adverse Event |
SOP |
Standard Operating Procedure |
Sponsor |
YaySave! |
Tx |
Time point x (i.e. Week 2, Week 4) |
Wx |
Study visit at Week X; “W2” = Week 2 |
Definitions
Monadic |
Refers to type of testing methodology in this document in which only a single sample is evaluated. The effects of the sample are evaluated and compared to Baseline measures. |
Controlled |
Refers to type of testing methodology in this document in which a sample is compared to a control. The effects of the sample are evaluated and compared to the control product. |
Study Product |
The investigative product (Shampoo) provided by the Sponsor to evaluate during this clinical study. |
Control Product |
A known product of similar nature (shampoo) to the Study Product (shampoo), used as a comparator in Controlled evaluation. |
Hair Tress |
Sample of human hair used in a laboratory setting to evaluate hair products. |
1.0 Introduction
This document is a report for a human research study. This study was conducted according to International Research Services, Inc. research policies and Standard Operating Procedures, U.S. and international standards of Good Clinical Practice (FDA and ICH guidelines) and applicable government regulations.
2.0 Objectives
2.1 Primary Objective
To evaluate the effectiveness of a hair care product in the improvement of hair and scalp condition and appearance after repeated use.
3.0 Study Design
This was an eight-week monadic evaluation of one hair care product’s ability to improve hair and scalp condition and appearance. All subjects used product at home for eight weeks, returning to the clinic for evaluation after four and eight weeks of repeated use. Subjects underwent expert clinical visual grading of hair and scalp, instrumental assessments and photography at study visits. Additionally, subjects tracked hair loss prior to each visit and indicated their perception of the product and its effects via subjective questionnaire completion. Thirty-one (31) subjects completed study participation. The study also included a single use controlled instrumental evaluation of the product performed on hair tresses to evaluate strength.
Study visits occurred at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8. A detailed outline of study visits appears in Section 7.6 of the protocol (see Appendix I).
3.1 Claims:
Assessment and questionnaire data will be analyzed with particular regard to the following desired key product effects:
1. Reduces hair loss due to breakage, as determined by Repeated Grooming Assay results.
2. Improves strength of hair, as determined by Repeated Grooming Assay results.
3. Adds body and shine to hair, as determined by expert clinical grading and subjective questionnaire results.
4. Increases volume and thickness, as determined by expert clinical grading and subjective questionnaire results.
5. Promotes healthy scalp, as determined by expert clinical grading and subjective questionnaire results.
6. Reduces split ends, as determined by expert clinical grading and subjective questionnaire results.
7. Provides deep hydration (to scalp), as determined by Corneometer and subjective questionnaire results.
4.0 Product
All products were provided by the Sponsor and were labeled with appropriate codes and proper use instructions. Supportive product(s) were provided by IRSI. Upon receipt, product was logged in and stored in a secure area. Within one month of issuance of the final signed report, unless otherwise instructed in writing, all test products, used and unused, will be destroyed and disposed of in accordance with IRSI’s SOP.
4.1 Product Descriptions
Designation |
Formula Number |
Date Received |
Quantity Received |
|
Study Products |
|
|
||
Pura d'or Hair Loss Prevention Therapy Shampoo |
Shampoo |
851615006006 |
3-26-15 |
70 |
9-15-15 |
32 |
4.2 Product Use Instructions
Sponsor-provided use instructions listed below were explained to subjects and were provided to each subject in their printed Study Instructions (See Appendix I of the Study Protocol which is attached as Appendix I of this Report).
Test Product Instructions:
Wet hair, lather in product, leaving on the scalp and hair for 2 minutes. Rinse thoroughly.
Use test product at least three times per week.
Subjects were instructed to use 5 pumps of the product.
Test product use will begin three days after the Baseline visit, after Baseline hair collection is complete per Section 6.4. For days 0, 1, 2 subjects will continue use of their usual hair care products.
5.0 Population
5.1 Sample Size
The sample size of n=30 was requested by the Sponsor.
A total number of 32 subjects were enrolled in the study and 31 completed eight weeks of study participation.
5.2 Inclusion Criteria
1. Males and Females in good general health, and between ages of 30 and 70 years old, inclusive at enrollment
- Subjects with self-perceived thinning hair and/or hair loss
- Subjects will be able to read, understand and willing to sign an ICF, including HIPAA and state requirements, complete a brief personal/medical history
- Subjects are willing and able to follow all study directions, attend study visits as scheduled and must be willing to accept the restrictions of the study including but not limited to:
a. Subjects agree to refrain from hair coloring or undergoing any chemical hair treatment(s) for the duration of the study
b. Subjects agree to wash their hair with the test product at least three times per week for the duration of the study
c. Subjects agree to refrain from using any other hair care products, (shampoos, dry shampoos, conditioners, leave in conditioners).
d. Subjects agree to refrain from introducing any new styling products or methods (tools) for the duration of the study.
5.3 Exclusion Criteria
- Subjects with over-processed, severely damaged hair.
- Subjects with scalp diseases/ infections including fungal infection, psoriasis, ring worm, head lice or severe dry/cracked skin on the scalp.
General exclusion criteria:
- Subjects participating in any other clinical studies
- Subjects having an acute or chronic disease or medical condition, including dermatological problems, which could put the subject at risk in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or compromise study outcomes. Typical uncontrolled chronic or serious diseases and conditions which would prevent participation in any clinical trial are cancer, AIDS, diabetes, morbid obesity, renal impairment, mental illness, drug/alcohol addiction.
- Subjects who are unreliable or unlikely to be available for the duration of the study
- History of allergic reactions, skin sensitization and/or known allergies to cosmetic ingredients, toiletries, sunscreens, etc.
- Immunocompromised subjects
- Woman known to be pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant within six months. Subjects who become pregnant during the study must inform the Principal Investigator immediately
- Individuals unable to communicate or cooperate with the Principal Investigator due to language problems, poor mental development, or impaired cerebral function
- Employees of IRSI or other testing firms/ laboratories, cosmetic or raw goods manufacturers or suppliers
6.0 Methods
This study was performed in accordance to IRSI final signed clinical study protocol number 3920YS0215 version 2.3 dated July 23, 2015. A detailed description of study methods is outlined in the attached clinical study protocol (See Appendix I).
7.0 Procedure
The three-visit clinical study included one visit for consenting, screening and qualification procedures and Baseline pre-application evaluations, another visit at Week 4 and a final visit at Week 8. A detailed description of procedures is outlined in the attached clinical study protocol (See Appendix I).
7.1 Procedure Summary Table
Procedures |
Baseline |
Week 4 |
Week 8 |
|
Study Initiation and Qualification |
Informed Consent and Medical History |
X |
|
|
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria reviewed |
X |
|
|
|
Dispense/ Collect Products |
D |
|
C |
|
Consumer Perception |
Subjective Questionnaire |
|
X |
X |
Clinical Grading |
- Hair Body (volume, stiffness, springiness) - Hair Shine - Split ends -Healthy scalp appearance |
X |
X |
X |
Instrumentation |
Corneometer (scalp) |
X |
X |
X |
Photography |
Digital Clinical Photography n=10 sub-group (3 views: Top of head, R profile and Back view) |
X |
X |
X |
Hair Loss Measurement |
For three days after BL and three days prior to each subsequent visit hair collected by subject and returned to clinic in plastic bag for weight |
X |
X |
X |
Repeated Grooming Assay |
Hair Strength/ Anti-Breakage |
To be completed on hair tresses during study duration. |
8.0 Concomitant Medications and Products
The use of any hair care products other than those provided, including shampoos, conditioners, dry shampoos, hair oils and powders was prohibited for the duration of the study period starting on Day 3 when test product use began. For days 0, 1 and 2, subjects were to use their usual hair care products.
If a subject felt that use of a conditioner was required at any point during the study, the subject was instructed to contact the Study Coordinator for instruction on how to proceed. The subject was permitted to use their own conditioner, but was to record the use on diary each time it was used; the name and brand of the product was also recorded.
Subjects were not allowed to chemically alter their hair in any way during the study, including dying hair, chemically straightening or perming hair. Subjects were not permitted to introduce any new hair styling products for the duration of the study. Subjects must have used their styling product / method (tools) for at least two weeks prior to Baseline in order for it to be considered their “usual” products. Hot styling tools were permitted for use. Haircuts were allowed.
9.0 Adverse Events
No adverse events were reported during the conduct of this study.
10.0 Institutional Review Board
IRB review and approval of this study was not requested by the Sponsor.
11.0 Informed Consent
The informed consent process was completed prior to an individual’s involvement in any study related activity. The process was documented using a written informed consent form (ICF) conforming to FDA 21 CFR 50.25 (See Appendix I Protocol, Section 11.0 and Appendix IV).
After review, two copies of the ICF were signed and dated by the individual and the Principal Investigator or his designee administering the consent. One original copy was retained by IRSI and the other was given to the individual.
12.0 Discontinuation of Study
Per protocol, the Sponsor had the option to end the study at eight weeks, or continue on to twelve weeks. The Sponsor chose to end the study after eight weeks.
13.0 Changes to the Protocol
13.1 Protocol Amendments
One amendment was made to the final study protocol. The signed Protocol Amendment is included in Appendix II.
- The TRI Assay used to assess hair strength was changed from the Diastron Assay to measure “tensile strength” to a Repeated Grooming Assay to evaluate “anti-breakage / hair strength” as well as the claim “reduces hair loss due to breakage”.
13.2 Protocol Deviations
No protocol deviations occurred during the study.
14.0 Monitoring
The Sponsor did not monitor any portion of this clinical study.
15.0 Recording of Data
All data and information, except electronically recorded data, was recorded on specific paper case report forms (CRFs) as described in the clinical study protocol (See Appendix I Protocol, Appendix III).
16.0 Quality Control and Quality Assurance
This clinical study has been audited by the IRSI Quality Assurance / Quality Control auditor. The auditor verified study for accuracy, consistency and proper documentation in accordance to IRSI SOPs and practices. Additionally, accuracy of results reported in the body of this report with respect to the results reported in the data listings and statistical report (See Appendix III).
The data listings and database used for statistical analysis was verified against the CRFs. The data listings were verified against the CRFs for 100% of the data, in a randomly selected set of the subjects (25% of the total number of subjects). The statistical report was validated for accuracy and completeness, as well as verifying the correctness of all subject numbers (n) and the analyses performed according to the Statistical Analysis Plan as described in Section 18 of the clinical study protocol.
17.0 Ethics
The study was conducted in accordance with FDA GCP regulations and ICH guidelines in as much as they apply to cosmetic research with the following noted: This was not an IND / NDA clinical trial. IRSI does not assume any Sponsor obligations as stipulated in FDA GCP and ICH documents. This study is not intended for submission to the FDA.
18.0 Statistical Methods
The planned statistical analysis was performed as outlined in the study protocol for each type of data to be acquired. (See Protocol, Section 18.0)
The per-protocol (PP) population is defined as the subset of subjects that who complied with the protocol sufficiently to ensure that their data will be likely to exhibit the effects of the treatment. To be considered a PP subject, a subject could not miss more than one study visit (excluding Baseline and the final visit - Week 8) or be found to be non-compliant with the study protocol at the discretion of the Principal Investigator (PI).
The PP population was used for statistical analysis at each time point. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05.
Statistical Method |
Data Reported |
|
Demographics |
Descriptive Statistics |
Mean and standard deviation Min and Max Frequency (number and percent) |
Clinical Grading for Efficacy, Instrumental Evaluation, Hair Loss Evaluation |
Descriptive Statistics Paired T-test (monadic), |
Mean and standard deviation Mean percent improvement from Baseline Percent of subjects improving P-value vs. Baseline |
Subjective Questionnaire |
Descriptive Statistics |
Frequency tables (n and %) of each response Percent of subjects responding favorably. |
Repeated Grooming Assay |
NA |
Analyzed and reported by TRI |
19.0 Results
19.1 Tables
Enrollment and demographic information is reported below in Tables 1.0-2.0. Expert visual grading results are included in Table 3.0, instrumental results are included in Table 4.0, hair loss evaluation results are in Table 5.0, anti-breakage results are in Table 6.0 and subjective questionnaire results are included in Table 7.0.
Status |
n |
|
Enrolled |
32 |
|
Discontinued |
1 |
Subject #9 discontinued at Week 4. |
Completed Baseline time point |
32 |
|
Completed Week 4 time point |
30 |
Subject #9 and #27 missed the Week 4 visit. |
Completed Week 8 time point |
31 |
|
Table 2.0 Demographics
Variable |
n |
Mean ± SD |
Min |
Max |
Age (years) |
31 |
50.22 ± 10.61 |
31 |
68 |
Height (inches) |
31 |
64.83 ± 3.73 |
59 |
73 |
Weight (pounds) |
31 |
176.03 ± 50.83 |
107 |
329 |
|
n |
Percent |
||
Sex |
31 |
Female |
22 |
71.0% |
Male |
9 |
29.0% |
||
|
n |
Percent |
||
Ethnicity |
31 |
Hispanic or Latino |
7 |
22.6% |
Not Hispanic or Latino |
24 |
77.4% |
||
|
n |
Percent |
||
Race |
31 |
African American or Black |
2 |
6.5% |
Asian |
1 |
3.2% |
||
White |
23 |
74.2% |
||
No Response (see Hispanic or Latino above) |
5 |
16.1% |
Table 3.0 Experts Clinical Grader Evaluation – Monadic, Comparison to Baseline
Assessment |
Time Point |
n |
Mean ± SD |
Mean Percent Improvement From BL mean |
Percent of Subjects Showing Improvement From BL |
P-Value TX vs. BL |
Springiness (bounciness) |
Baseline |
31 |
1.82 ± 0.64 |
|
|
|
Week 4 |
30 |
2.80 ± 0.40 |
78.66% |
86.7% |
<0.001* |
|
Week 8 |
31 |
3.03 ± 0.34 |
98.11% |
96.8% |
<0.001* |
|
Volume (bulk/thickness) |
Baseline |
31 |
1.91 ± 0.63 |
|
|
|
Week 4 |
30 |
2.70 ± 0.28 |
53.44% |
76.7% |
<0.001* |
|
Week 8 |
31 |
3.01 ± 0.32 |
76.18% |
96.8% |
<0.001* |
|
Stiffness (set, not soft) |
Baseline |
31 |
1.91 ± 0.64 |
|
|
|
Week 4 |
30 |
2.71 ± 0.38 |
64.72% |
83.3% |
<0.001* |
|
Week 8 |
31 |
3.29 ± 0.28 |
110.26% |
96.8% |
<0.001* |
|
Hair Shine |
Baseline |
31 |
1.77 ± 0.61 |
|
|
|
Week 4 |
30 |
2.93 ± 0.36 |
95.05% |
90.0% |
<0.001* |
|
Week 8 |
31 |
3.25 ± 0.33 |
117.79% |
96.8% |
<0.001* |
|
Split Ends |
Baseline |
31 |
2.24 ± 0.63 |
|
|
|
Week 4 |
30 |
2.75 ± 0.46 |
31.94% |
70.0% |
<0.001* |
|
Week 8 |
31 |
3.27 ± 0.31 |
63.76% |
93.5% |
<0.001* |
|
Scalp Health |
Baseline |
31 |
2.22 ± 0.51 |
|
|
|
Week 4 |
30 |
3.11 ± 0.33 |
45.77% |
93.3% |
<0.001* |
|
Week 8 |
31 |
3.56 ± 0.33 |
68.44% |
100% |
<0.001* |
Table 3.0 Key |
|
*Indicates a statistically significant improvement compared to baseline, p≤0.05 |
|
BL = Baseline, before treatment |
|
TX = Post-treatment time point (Week 4 or Week 8) |
|
SD = Standard Deviation |
|
Grading scales. Note half points were used as necessary by the expert grader. Increase is indicative of an improvement for all scales listed below. |
|
Springiness (bounciness) |
0 = Compressed, no spring or bounce 4 = Airy, weightless appearance, high spring, bounce |
Volume (bulk/thickness) |
0 = Thin, closely follows shape of skull 4 = Thick, bulky, high elevation from skull and lateral displacement |
Stiffness (set, not soft) |
0 = Soft, does not hold shape, not resilient 4 = Firm, holds shape, resilient |
Hair Shine |
0 = Dull, matte appearance 4 = High gloss, luster |
Split Ends |
0 = Many split ends, severe splitting 4 = No split ends, no splitting |
Scalp Health |
0 = Rough, flaking, plaques, cracked and/or reddened appearance 4 = Smooth, intact, even-toned appearance |
Table 4.0 Instrumental Evaluation – Monadic, Comparison to Baseline
Assessment |
Time Point |
n |
Mean ± SD |
Mean Percent Improvement From BL mean |
Percent of Subjects Showing Improvement From BL |
P-Value TX vs. BL |
Corneometer |
Baseline |
31 |
34.33 ± 21.31 |
|
|
|
Week 4 |
30 |
8.91 ± 14.40 |
NI |
3.3% |
<0.001** |
|
Week 8 |
31 |
18.37 ± 13.77 |
NI |
16.1% |
<0.001** |
Table 4.0 Key |
|
NI = No improvement |
|
**Indicates a statistically significant worsening compared to baseline, p≤0.05 |
|
BL = Baseline, before treatment |
|
TX = Post-treatment time point (Week 4 or Week 8) |
|
SD = Standard Deviation |
|
Corneometer |
Instrumental device to measure water content. Measures in arbitrary units from 0 (no water at all) - 120 (on water) Increase is indicative of an improvement in hydration of the skin |
Table 5.0 Hair Loss Evaluation – Monadic, Comparison to Baseline
Assessment |
Time Point |
n |
Mean ± SD |
Mean Percent Improvement From BL mean |
Percent of Subjects Showing Improvement From BL |
P-Value TX vs. BL |
Hair Loss |
Baseline |
31 |
5.90 ± 0.73 |
|
|
|
Week 4 |
30 |
6.07 ± 0.46 |
NI |
30.0% |
0.321 |
|
Week 8 |
31 |
6.12 ± 0.87 |
NI |
22.6% |
0.307 |
Table 5.0 Key |
|
NI = No improvement |
|
BL = Baseline, before treatment |
|
TX = Post-treatment time point (Week 4 or Week 8) |
|
SD = Standard Deviation |
|
Hair Loss |
Evaluated by measuring (by weight in grams) hair collected by the subjects over a period of three days. |
Table 6.0 Anti-Breakage/Strength Testing – Product Comparison
Assessment |
n |
Mean ± SD Broken Fibers |
Standard Error Mean |
Percent Reduction in Breakage Product vs. Control |
PT-Value Product vs. Control |
|
Anti-Breakage |
Control Product |
8 |
28.63 ± 5.34 |
1.89 |
|
|
Study Product |
8 |
18.88 ± 5.54 |
1.96 |
34.05% |
0.003T |
Table 6.0 Key |
|
T Results show a statistically significant lower breakage for Study Product (Pura d’or) as compared to the Control (Clarifying Shampoo). |
|
SD = Standard Deviation |
|
Anti-Breakage |
Evaluated by measuring (by count) broken hair fibers collected during Repeat Grooming Assay performed on hair tresses. |
Table 7.0 Subjective Questionnaire – Consumer Perception
Question |
n |
Week 4 |
Percent Responding Favorably |
||||
Response n (%) |
|||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
|||
|
30 |
3 (10.0%) |
13 (43.3%) |
9 (30.0%) |
3 (10.0%) |
2 (6.7%) |
53.3% |
|
30 |
4 (13.3%) |
15 (50.0%) |
8 (26.7%) |
3 (10.0%) |
0 (0.0%) |
63.3% |
|
30 |
4 (13.3%) |
13 (43.3%) |
8 (26.7%) |
5 (16.7%) |
0 (0.0%) |
56.7% |
|
30 |
3 (10.0%) |
7 (23.3%) |
14 (46.7%) |
5 (16.7%) |
1 (3.3%) |
33.3% |
|
30 |
3 (10.0%) |
6 (20.0%) |
16 (53.3%) |
3 (10.0%) |
2 (6.7%) |
30.0% |
|
30 |
2 (6.7%) |
5 (16.7%) |
19 (63.3%) |
4 (13.3%) |
0 (0.0%) |
23.3% |
|
30 |
2 (6.7%) |
7 (23.3%) |
16 (53.3%) |
4 (13.3%) |
1 (3.3%) |
30.0% |
|
30 |
2 (6.7%) |
9 (30.0%) |
15 (50.0%) |
4 (13.3%) |
0 (0.0%) |
36.7% |
|
30 |
2 (6.7%) |
9 (30.0%) |
17 (56.7%) |
2 (6.7%) |
0 (0.0%) |
36.7% |
|
30 |
3 (10.0%) |
15 (50.0%) |
7 (23.3%) |
5 (16.7%) |
0 (0.0%) |
60.0% |
|
30 |
2 (6.7%) |
8 (26.7%) |
16 (53.3%) |
4 (13.3%) |
0 (0.0%) |
33.3% |
Table 7.0 Key |
Bold/ Shaded = the majority of subjects responded favorably, >50% |
n = number of subjects |
n(%) = number of subjects (percent of subjects) |
Responding Favorably = Responding to the question with “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” |
Questions were listed in questionnaire exactly as worded above, with response options Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree and Strongly Disagree, listed in that order |
Table 7.0 Subjective Questionnaire – Consumer Perception
Question |
n |
Week 8 |
Percent Responding Favorably |
||||
Response n (%) |
|||||||
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
|||
|
31 |
3 (9.7%) |
14 (45.2%) |
9 (29.0%) |
5 (16.1%) |
0 (0.0%) |
54.8% |
|
31 |
4 (12.9%) |
16 (51.6%) |
7 (22.6%) |
4 (12.9%) |
0 (0.0%) |
64.5% |
|
31 |
4 (12.9%) |
15 (48.4%) |
8 (25.8%) |
4 (12.9%) |
0 (0.0%) |
61.3% |
|
31 |
5 (16.1%) |
8 (25.8%) |
11 (35.5%) |
7 (22.6%) |
0 (0.0%) |
41.9% |
|
31 |
3 (9.7%) |
11 (35.5%) |
10 (32.3%) |
6 (19.4%) |
1 (3.2%) |
45.2% |
|
31 |
3 (9.7%) |
11 (35.5%) |
11 (35.5%) |
5 (16.1%) |
1 (3.2%) |
45.2% |
|
31 |
4 (12.9%) |
11 (35.5%) |
11 (35.5%) |
3 (9.7%) |
2 (6.5%) |
48.4% |
|
31 |
2 (6.5%) |
10 (32.3%) |
13 (41.9%) |
6 (19.4%) |
0 (0.0%) |
38.7% |
|
31 |
3 (9.7%) |
12 (38.7%) |
12 (38.7%) |
4 (12.9%) |
0 (0.0%) |
48.4% |
|
31 |
4 (12.9%) |
15 (48.4%) |
5 (16.1%) |
7 (22.6%) |
0 (0.0%) |
61.3% |
|
31 |
4 (12.9%) |
10 (32.3%) |
12 (38.7%) |
4 (12.9%) |
1 (3.2%) |
45.2% |
Table 7.0 Key |
Bold/ Shaded = the majority of subjects responded favorably, >50% |
n = number of subjects |
n(%) = number of subjects (percent of subjects) |
Responding Favorably = Responding to the question with “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” |
Questions were listed in questionnaire exactly as worded above, with response options Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree and Strongly Disagree, listed in that order |
19.2 Discussion
19.2.1 Enrollment and Demographics
A total of 30 male and female subjects between the age of 30 and 70 years old were required to complete study participation. The study completed with 31 male and female subjects with an age range of 31 to 68 with an average age of 50.22 years old. The population’s reported ethnicity was 77.4% Non-Hispanic or Latino and 22.6% Hispanic/Latino, and its reported racial diversity was 74.2% White, 16.1% No Response (Hispanic/Latino), 6.5% African American and 3.2% Asian.
19.2.2 Expert Visual Grading
Comparison of mean results from Baseline to those at subsequent visits revealed statistically significant improvements in the appearance of hair springiness, volume, stiffness, shine, split ends and scalp health after four and eight weeks of use.
19.2.3 Instrumental Assessments
Statistically significant worsening (decrease) from Baseline was observed in mean Corneometer results for hairline scalp hydration after four and eight weeks of test product use.
19.2.4 Hair Loss Evaluation
Statistically significant change from Baseline was not observed in mean hair loss at either the Week 4 or Week 8 visits.
19.2.5 Anti-Breakage / Strength Testing
The Repeated Grooming Assay performed by TRI showed a statistically significant difference between hair breakage rates between the control and test product results. These results indicate hair treated with the test product showed a significantly less amount of breakage and in turn less hair loss from tress, than hair treated with the control product, indicating an improvement in hair strength. The test product statistically significantly outperformed the control product in regards to hair breakage rate, and showed a 34.05% reduction in hair breakage when compared to the control shampoo.
19.2.6 Subjective Questionnaire
After four and eight weeks of use, a majority of subjects (>50%) responded favorably (“Strongly Agree” or “Agree”) to “The product improved the shine of my hair”, “The product improved the body of my hair”, “The product improved the volume of my hair” and “Overall, the product improved the healthy appearance of my hair”.
20.0 Conclusion
In conclusion, under the conditions of this study, use of Pura d'or Hair Loss Prevention Therapy Shampoo #851615006006 led tosignificant improvements in hair and scalp appearance and in hair strength, as evidenced by results from expert clinical grading, anti-breakage testing and subjective questionnaire results.
Expert clinical grading revealed statistically significant improvements in the appearance hair springiness, volume, stiffness, shine, split ends and scalp health after four and eight weeks of use.
Anti-breakage testing showed significant less breakage in hair treated with test product versus that treated with control product. The test product was found to reduce breakage by 34.05% after a single use.
Subjective questionnaire results revealed that the majority of subjects believed that test product use resulted in improvements in hair shine, body, volume and overall healthy appearanceafter four and eight weeks of use.